I meant to send this to the whole list! Sorry Will for just sending it to
you!



There should not have to be such a SLAM! antagonism in this event. As far as
I know this is a discussion on activism being organized by the Hunter Senate
student caucus for the student body. The objective is for people who attend
to hear all perspectives, share their own perspectives, and learn from each
other. While discussing perspectives on activism, it is not a debate on
Hunter, USG, and the like. Am I thinking incorrectly?


on 3/24/03 2:50, somebody named William Lim from [log in to unmask]
wrote:

> In setting a date, we should get a written commitment from SLAM that they
> will come on the agreed date. This way they cannot claim ignorance of the
> event or say that we deliberately set the date to coincide with a protest.
> I don't want another repeat of Friday where they didn't respond but in the
> end came to the meeting howling and whining.
>
> -WL
>
> At 06:57 PM 3/23/03 -0800, Jeni Incontro wrote:
>
>> Good call Jillian.
>>
>> I'd love to speak for USG Common Sense.  Should we start throwing around a
>> few dates?  Which location would be attainable and effective?
>>
>> Jeni
>