Let's see how Alisha's meeting at Brookdale dorms goes on Wednesday. I've
suggested previously that clubs should run "focus group" type meetings with
their members or the general student body, but these are small
conversational meetings rather than formalized panel discussions.

Maybe this would be an opportunity for opposition candidates to publicly
declare? (I will discuss this more privately).

-WL

At 02:30 PM 3/22/03 -0500, Dan Jones wrote:
>Cool,
>I think a more formalized panel format will help the discussion to be
>started, and it also ensures that it doesn't become too firey of a debate
>while still being controversial.
>*217 HW would be awesome (accessible but not disruptive)
>*We could do it on Apr. 9
>*Invite all sides of the debate - on the main questions on the question you
>suggested
>
>Questions:
>*Sponsor it by whom?
>*Invite professors who do social movement theory?
>
>
>Jillian, are you point-person on this project?
>
>-dan
>
>on 3/21/03 9:34, somebody named Jillian Murray from [log in to unmask]
>wrote:
>
> > Ok, I think we have some different ideas going around here, and we should
> > decide soon what we want to do. I have to leave for a meeting in a few
> > minutes, so I'm just going to itemize some stuff:
> > -- Big event (HW lobby, 217HW) or small (senate conference room)?
> > -- Panel discussion of ~5 students on the topic of "How I'm a 'student
> > activist,' and why" (or something like that) each giving a 15-min
> > presentation followed by audience discussion, Q&A?
> > -- or... Just a big discussion group, with no panel?
> > -- Is this "informational" (much like the Brookdale Meeting next week), or
> > "controversial," (at least in the sense of having dialogue around opposing
> > viewpoints)
> >
> > I'll have to do some digging around to find out if we can even reserve the
> > West Lobby. But we'll see.
> > -Jillian