STUDENTCAUCUS-L Archives

March 2003, Week 3

STUDENTCAUCUS-L@HUNTER.LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jon Gradowski <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jon Gradowski <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 16 Mar 2003 19:51:03 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
adequate funding is too subjective. Indeed, Pataki et al would argue, even
w/ the reduction, funding is, well, "adequate." Define adequate
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jillian Murray" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2003 6:32 PM
Subject: Re: Resolution on Tuition Increases


> I think I'm with Dan on this one. And we know how the Senate can start up
> with their niggling details. At this point, in the Hunter community, facts
> abound about what the tuition hike will do. So let's just stand on our
> resolution.
> But as for the "restore full funding to CUNY," which I noted was a bit
> troublesome. What about "restore adequate funding"?
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> - - - - - - - - - -
> "Can it be that my fate as a novelist consists
> in compromising all my heroes and heroines
> in the eyes of well-bred people?"
> -- Nikolai Gavrilovich Chernyshevsky, "What Is to Be Done?"
> - - - - - - - - - -
> Jillian Murray
> http://studentweb.hunter.cuny.edu/~murrayj
> - - - - - - - - - -
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2