Wasn't Fabio supposed to dig around for some stuff on how the state is
providing less to CUNY than legally required? Something like that. Once we
have that bit of info down then "restore adequate" would make sense.

-WL

At 07:51 PM 3/16/03 -0500, Jon Gradowski wrote:
>adequate funding is too subjective. Indeed, Pataki et al would argue, even
>w/ the reduction, funding is, well, "adequate." Define adequate
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jillian Murray" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2003 6:32 PM
>Subject: Re: Resolution on Tuition Increases
>
>
> > I think I'm with Dan on this one. And we know how the Senate can start up
> > with their niggling details. At this point, in the Hunter community, facts
> > abound about what the tuition hike will do. So let's just stand on our
> > resolution.
> > But as for the "restore full funding to CUNY," which I noted was a bit
> > troublesome. What about "restore adequate funding"?
> >
> > Thoughts?