Prefer the phrase "Applied Logic", much of which is non formal/critical thinking.

Tom Hodgson

Instructor in Philosophy
Department of Philosophy and Religious  Studies
Phillips Academy
Andover, MA

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 8, 2016, at 1:48 PM, "Frasz, Geoffrey" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> I second  wht Kevin is saying.  I’ll only add that many Communications Depts. provide courses that deal with Argumentation Theory, especially in the context of rhetoric and persuasions. 
> Geoffrey Frasz
> 
> 
> On 7/8/16, 9:25 AM, "AILACT DISCUSSION LIST on behalf of Possin, Kevin E" <[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> No offense, but philosophy departments are skeptical enough already of the label 'Critical Thinking'--they would be even more so of 'Argumentation Theory.'
> 
> 'Informal Logic/Critical Thinking' would be more comfortable for them, in my experience.
> 
> Kevin Possin
> 
> 
>> On Jul 8, 2016, at 10:44 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> 
>> Perhaps it would help if were listed as Critical Thinking/Argumentation Theory.
>> 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Michael
>> 
>> 
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> Michael A. Gilbert, Professor, Department of Philosophy
>> 
>> 
>> f;ykc
>>> On Jul 8, 2016, at 10:31 AM, Fair, Frank <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear Colleagues,
>>> 
>>> I agree with Harvey that Bob¹s question is a good one. How about starting
>>> with talking to Mike Morris who evidently fields questions about PhilJobs?
>>> (See http://www.apaonline.org/?page=pj_jfp) We can simply ask him if the
>>> limitation preventing the speciality from being listed as an AOC or AOS is
>>> still in force, and, if it is, what the possible process would be to add a
>>> new AOC or AOS. Perhaps only inertia is standing in the way?
>>> 
>>> For what it is worth I¹d propose that, if a new category can be added to
>>> either the AOC or AOS listings, it be Informal Logic and Critical Thinking.
>>> 
>>> Frank
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 7/8/16, 9:00 AM, "AILACT DISCUSSION LIST on behalf of Siegel, Harvey"
>>> <[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Thanks Jim! Bob¹s is a good question. Anyone have any good ideas? ‹Harvey
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jul 7, 2016, at 8:26 PM, ennis, robert h <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Jim and all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks, Jim, for clearing up a confusing situation. I hope I can
>>>>> remember AILACTD-L, including that the dash goes between the D and the
>>>>> L. My memory isn¹t as good as it used to be.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have a question for discussion:
>>>>> 
>>>>> What can we do about the fact that critical thinking is not recognized
>>>>> as an area of competence or specialization by "Jobs for Philosophers"?
>>>>> Many philosophy jobs do include at least teaching critical thinking, and
>>>>> a number of topics considered by philosophers are relevant to what is
>>>>> taught in critical thinking, such as causality, inference to best
>>>>> explanation, speech acts, the fact-value distinction, etc.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Bob Ennis
>>>>> 
>>>>> PS. By the way Jim, I would rather that you use the address I am using
>>>>> now than the one to which you sent your communication. The one I am
>>>>> using now seems to be more reliable and is more appropriate for the
>>>>> subject.
>>>>> 
>>>>> ########################################################################
>>>>> 
>>>>> To unsubscribe from the AILACTD-L list, click the following link:
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__HUNTER.LISTSERV.CUNY
>>>>> .EDU_scripts_wa-2Dhc.exe-3FTICKET-3DNzM2MTgyIGhzaWVnZWxATUlBTUkuRURVIEFJT
>>>>> EFDVEQtTDYq0a6TcGz3-26c-3DSIGNOFF&d=CwIFaQ&c=y2w-uYmhgFWijp_IQN0DhA&r=src
>>>>> AKVXGlgq-EGy4yMzdPmGUox7sOGJn6ivEUxBrRCY&m=AELJvFBCHEvccjWps_PoOcsYoVQCKb
>>>>> hWCrBOOXWxE_I&s=ptw8HjzQY8vZQAbCKNywpp_CRM8KP1OrWNIiATcWKWk&e=
>>>> 
>>>> ########################################################################
>>>> 
>>>> To unsubscribe from the AILACTD-L list, click the following link:
>>>> https://HUNTER.LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU/scripts/wa-hc.exe?TICKET=NzM2MTgzIFBTWV9G
>>>> S0ZAU0hTVS5FRFUgQUlMQUNURC1MIEJaOWN6c8Ul&c=SIGNOFF
>>> 
>>> ########################################################################
>>> 
>>> To unsubscribe from the AILACTD-L list, click the following link:
>>> https://HUNTER.LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU/scripts/wa-hc.exe?TICKET=NzM2MTgzIGdpbGJlcnRAWU9SS1UuQ0EgQUlMQUNURC1MIDvz9vNcngy3&c=SIGNOFF
>> 
>> ########################################################################
>> 
>> To unsubscribe from the AILACTD-L list, click the following link:
>> https://HUNTER.LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU/scripts/wa-hc.exe?TICKET=NzM2MTgzIEtQb3NzaW5AUkVUSVJFRS5XSU5PTkEuRURVIEFJTEFDVEQtTIl8CB9KJSLK&c=SIGNOFF
> 
> ########################################################################
> 
> To unsubscribe from the AILACTD-L list, click the following link:
> https://HUNTER.LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU/scripts/wa-hc.exe?TICKET=NzM2MTgzIGdlb2ZmcmV5LmZyYXN6QENTTi5FRFUgQUlMQUNURC1MIHsOJiby8qNP&c=SIGNOFF
> 
> 
> 
> ########################################################################
> 
> To unsubscribe from the AILACTD-L list, click the following link:
> https://HUNTER.LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU/scripts/wa-hc.exe?TICKET=NzM2MTgzIHRob2Rnc29uQEFORE9WRVIuRURVIEFJTEFDVEQtTP2RZ9GY4k4X&c=SIGNOFF

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the AILACTD-L list, click the following link:
https://hunter.listserv.cuny.edu/Scripts/wa-hc.exe?SUBED1=AILACTD-L