Cool, I think a more formalized panel format will help the discussion to be started, and it also ensures that it doesn't become too firey of a debate while still being controversial. *217 HW would be awesome (accessible but not disruptive) *We could do it on Apr. 9 *Invite all sides of the debate - on the main questions on the question you suggested Questions: *Sponsor it by whom? *Invite professors who do social movement theory? Jillian, are you point-person on this project? -dan on 3/21/03 9:34, somebody named Jillian Murray from [log in to unmask] wrote: > Ok, I think we have some different ideas going around here, and we should > decide soon what we want to do. I have to leave for a meeting in a few > minutes, so I'm just going to itemize some stuff: > -- Big event (HW lobby, 217HW) or small (senate conference room)? > -- Panel discussion of ~5 students on the topic of "How I'm a 'student > activist,' and why" (or something like that) each giving a 15-min > presentation followed by audience discussion, Q&A? > -- or... Just a big discussion group, with no panel? > -- Is this "informational" (much like the Brookdale Meeting next week), or > "controversial," (at least in the sense of having dialogue around opposing > viewpoints) > > I'll have to do some digging around to find out if we can even reserve the > West Lobby. But we'll see. > -Jillian