Cool,
I think a more formalized panel format will help the discussion to be
started, and it also ensures that it doesn't become too firey of a debate
while still being controversial.
*217 HW would be awesome (accessible but not disruptive)
*We could do it on Apr. 9
*Invite all sides of the debate - on the main questions on the question you
suggested

Questions:
*Sponsor it by whom?
*Invite professors who do social movement theory?


Jillian, are you point-person on this project?

-dan

on 3/21/03 9:34, somebody named Jillian Murray from [log in to unmask]
wrote:

> Ok, I think we have some different ideas going around here, and we should
> decide soon what we want to do. I have to leave for a meeting in a few
> minutes, so I'm just going to itemize some stuff:
> -- Big event (HW lobby, 217HW) or small (senate conference room)?
> -- Panel discussion of ~5 students on the topic of "How I'm a 'student
> activist,' and why" (or something like that) each giving a 15-min
> presentation followed by audience discussion, Q&A?
> -- or... Just a big discussion group, with no panel?
> -- Is this "informational" (much like the Brookdale Meeting next week), or
> "controversial," (at least in the sense of having dialogue around opposing
> viewpoints)
>
> I'll have to do some digging around to find out if we can even reserve the
> West Lobby. But we'll see.
> -Jillian