What does “natural” mean? One more time.
Posted: 28 Jan 2016 01:36 PM PST I’ve written repeatedly about the problem
of “natural” on food labels, but the issue just doesn’t go away. It won’t, until the FDA decides to rule on what it means. Now
Consumer Reports has done a survey of public understanding of the term. The survey reveals that 62% of respondents want foods to be “natural.” When they see the claim on a food package, they believe it has been
verified independently. Oops. They also believe that “natural” means no artificial ingredients (correct, according to the FDA’s non-definition) or GMOs (incorrect). The survey
confirms the idea that many people think “natural” is the same as “organic,” which it is not. Consumers,
says Consumer Reports, are naturally confused. And why wouldn’t we be, given the products labeled as “natural” (see the examples collected by
Consumer Reports). The FDA is currently collecting its own comments on this issue. You
can weigh in until May 15. Please do. |
You are subscribed to email updates from
Food Politics. |
Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |