|
|
Monday, June 5, 2017
|
|
|
|
Good afternoon! Welcome to D.C. Diagnosis, our twice-weekly roundup of stories on health politics and policy. Follow us on
Twitter and
Facebook for more news, and check out our other
newsletter offerings.
|
By
Daniel Marchalik
|
|
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
The call from the emergency department came in just as my urology clinic was winding down. “I’ve got a young guy here with a testicular mass; it doesn’t look good,” said the physician on the other end
of the line.
I walked down to the department’s overflow section and found Jason sitting up on a gurney. On the chair next to him hung the freshly pressed shirt he had exchanged for the standard-issue green and beige
hospital gown. Jason was worried — over the last nine months, his left testicle had been getting progressively larger, and today it was causing him severe pain. I examined him and said we would need to run some more tests and imaging studies; I was worried,
too.
Read
More
|
By
Associated Press
|
|
Susan Walsh/AP
WASHINGTON — Veterans Affairs Secretary David Shulkin said Monday the department will be overhauling its electronic health records, adopting a commercial product used by the Pentagon that he hopes will
improve care for veterans and reduce wait times for medical appointments.
Shulkin made the announcement at a news conference following a promotional tweet by President Trump that it will “be a big day for our veterans.”
Read
More
|
By
Liz Szabo — Kaiser Health News
|
|
Win McNamee/Getty Images
Less and less of the research presented at a prominent cancer conference is supported by the National Institutes of Health, a development that some of the country’s top scientists see as a worrisome trend.
The number of studies fully funded by the NIH at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) — the world’s largest gathering of cancer researchers — has fallen 75 percent in
the past decade, from 575 papers in 2008 to 144 this year, according to the society, which meets Friday through Tuesday in Chicago.
Read
More
|
Sponsor content by The Value Collaborative
How to create a reimbursement system as innovative as the medicines
Biopharmaceutical science is advancing faster than ever before, and we need to make sure we have a payment and reimbursement system that is as innovative as the medicines produced by our companies. In
this era of rapidly changing, personalized medicine, the private market is best positioned to evolve our health care system in a productive direction for patients.
Read more.
|
|
|
|
By
Ed Silverman
|
|
Frederick Florin/AFP/Getty Images
In a last-ditch effort, the Nevada state Senate late Sunday night passed legislation that combines Democratic and Republican efforts to contain the rising cost of diabetes drugs.
The move comes as the Nevada legislature holds it last day of the session and two days after the Nevada governor, a Republican, vetoed one of the bills over concerns it could backfire by hurting patients
and might also raise thorny legal questions. That legislation, which was introduced by a Democratic state senator, would have drug makers report pricing histories and disclose costs, among other things.
Read
More
|
By
Chris Pope
|
|
ROBYN BECK/AFP/Getty Images
Reforms to Medicaid proposed in the Republican-led American Health Care Act have provoked a certain degree of hysteria. Politicians, interest groups, and lobbyists have launched epithets at them ranging
from “unsustainable” and “damaging”
and have warned that the reforms are the “real death panels” and that “people
will die.” A recent report from
the Brookings Institution turned up the heat by suggesting that “implementing a Medicaid per-capita cap during the 2000s would have reduced federal Medicaid funding to more than half of states.”
The federal government currently allocates Medicaid money to states according to how much they are themselves able to spend on the program. The AHCA’s proposed caps would limit the amount by which each
state is able to automatically claim increases in funding per Medicaid enrollee from federal taxpayers in any particular year.
Read
More
|
|
|
|
|