Hello all,

The discussion has diverged into two strands.  I'd like to comment on both:

Regarding translating the AILACT site into other languages:  The site does not yet have enough content to be worthy of translation.  Of the 16 "proposed measures" listed at the end of the AILACT Innovation Memo, approved by the Board [was that 3 years ago?], translating the website into an array of languages is not among them.  Perhaps if a significant number of those projects were accomplished and their results posted on our website, we would have a site worth sharing with the world in more ways than just in English; but not now.  I think our efforts would be better spent revisiting that Innovation Memo and working on its projects, as challenging as they are.

Regarding the debate that Bob has generated, between CT and argumentation theory [AT]:  I am rather sympathetic to Bob's point of view.  The goal of CT is true belief, correct values, and rational action plans.  The goal of AT is persuasion.  The degree to which one thinks it is important to use argumentation and "dialectical" exchanges in the pursuit of the truth, is the degree to which one is interested in CT and justification and not solely interested in AT or sophistry.  Both AT and CT are interested in informal fallacies and cognitive biases, but for different reasons:  AT studies them descriptively, as argumentative phenomena and as useful means of persuasion--informal fallacies are notoriously effective at getting people to adopt beliefs, values, and action plans for which they have no good epistemic reasons.  CT studies those fallacies and biases normatively, as rhetorical tricks and cognitive habits to be avoided, both rationally and ethically.

CT holds that one is ethically obliged to follow one's best evidence to its sometimes bitter conclusions and to share those results with others rather than leaving them in error or ignorance.  So, in this respect, CT is interested in persuasion; but not persuasion for personal gain, but rather persuasion for the epistemic gain of everyone.

I am also inclined to agree with Bob's point of view regarding justification and knowledge:  There is no difference between knowledge and justification with respect to an individual's belief or a social group's belief.  To think that the group is more than the sum of its members is a category mistake a la Ryle's example of someone who still wants a tour of the university campus after seeing all the buildings, students, etc.  The so-called "dialectal" exchanges that occur among individuals in a group, debating the pros and cons of a position, is no different than an individual mulling over the same evidence and counter-evidence with respect to that position on their own.  Both are held to the same justificatory standards advocated by CT.

Thanks for your consideration,

Kevin


On May 10, 2018, at 5:11 PM, Lilian Bermejo Luque wrote:

Dear all,

The board of directors of AILACT is going to launch a series of questions in order to encourage members to colectively debate and decide about possible ways of invigorating our association. The first question we would like to ask is this:

Expanding the presence of the Argumentation, Critical Thinking and Informal Logic community in non-English speaking countries seems like a sound goal for our association. Do you think it would be a good idea to have our website translated into other languages, like Spanish, Chinese, Portuguese, etc.? In case you do, how do you think we should do it? Do you have other ideas to achieve this goal?

Kind regards,
Lilian


--
Dra. Lilian Bermejo Luque
Profesora Titular
Departamento de Filosofía I
Universidad de Granada
Tlf. +34 958249725
http://www.ugr.es/~lilianbl/index.htm<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ugr.es_-257Elilianbl_index.htm&d=DwMFaQ&c=mRWFL96tuqj9V0Jjj4h40ddo0XsmttALwKjAEOCyUjY&r=KTO-67piPlkvVwpkegE90CPhOOUVOHyNkd2ycJxraVlOjFMzr4s8w_Q89bvfLZgJ&m=RcykJiY8PCuiR9ILmd86mHFEikhAeP_83CDAM94iY8Y&s=U2v3RKEJs9O-58raIoWTBBEB727CtIutrRiGVW-ws7o&e=>

________________________________

To unsubscribe from the AILACTD-L list, click the following link:
https://HUNTER.LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU/scripts/wa-hc.exe?TICKET=NzM2ODU0IEtQb3NzaW5AUkVUSVJFRS5XSU5PTkEuRURVIEFJTEFDVEQtTB8Ris3MozLr&c=SIGNOFF

********************************
Kevin Possin
Professor Emeritus
Department of Philosophy
Winona State University
The Critical Thinking Lab
1012 Calle Dorthia
Santa Fe, NM  87506
USA
507.459.6689





########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the AILACTD-L list, click the following link:
https://hunter.listserv.cuny.edu/Scripts/wa-hc.exe?SUBED1=AILACTD-L