NFS-L Archives

March 2016

NFS-L@HUNTER.LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Arlene Spark <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 21 Mar 2016 16:48:20 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (4 kB) , text/html (14 kB)


-----------
Arlene Spark, EdD, RD, FADA, FACN
Professor and MPH & DPH Nutrition Advisor
CUNY School of Public Health and Health Policy
<[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>


Begin forwarded message:

From: Food Politics by Marion Nestle <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
Date: March 21, 2016 at 12:46:55 PM EDT
To: <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
Subject: Food Politics
Reply-To: Food Politics by Marion Nestle <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>

Food Politics<http://www.foodpolitics.com>

________________________________

The UK soda tax: a tipping point?<http://www.foodpolitics.com/2016/03/the-uk-soda-tax-a-tipping-point/>

Posted: 21 Mar 2016 04:36 AM PDT

Wonder of wonders, the UK’s Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne<http://www.theguardian.com/politics/georgeosborne>, has put a soda tax into his new budget initiative<https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/budget-2016-george-osbornes-speech> (see BBC account<http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-35813973>, the video<http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/video/2016/mar/16/osborne-announces-soft-drinks-sugar-tax-and-tax-free-personal-allowance-budget-highlights-video> and text of Osborne’s speech<https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/budget-2016-george-osbornes-speech>, and the Treasury department’s fact sheet on the soda tax<http://www.foodpolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/160315-Soft-drinks-stakeholder-infosheet-FINAL-2.pdf>).

Here’s how the tax is supposed to work:

[Shocking: Many of Britain's most sugary drinks contain more that the daily recommended amount for one person]

Osborne says<http://money.cnn.com/2016/03/16/news/sugar-levy-uk-budget/index.html> the tax will bring in £520 million ($732 million) in the first year, and he intends to use it to fund more sports in schools.

But it goes into effect in April 2018.  This is to give the industry time to reformulate products with less sugar.  But—the delay also gives the industry ample time to block the tax.

Public Health England supports the tax (see statement<https://www.gov.uk/government/news/levy-on-high-sugar-drinks-phe-statement>).

But the soda industry wasted no time<http://www.beveragedaily.com/Regulation-Safety/UK-sugar-tax-on-sugar-sweetened-drinks-industry-reaction> reacting to this bad news.<https://t.co/j8Izu3QHe7>

  *   Coke, Pepsi, and other soft drink companies strongly objected<http://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/mar/17/coca-cola-hits-back-at-sugar-tax-plan>.
  *   The immediate result: a fall in their stock prices<http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/budget-2016-sugar-tax-announcement-sees-soft-drink-shares-plummet-a6934286.html>.
  *   The immediate reaction: Sue the government<http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/politics/7014975/Coca-Cola-plan-to-gun-down-George-Osbornes-1bn-Sugar-Tax-in-the-European-courts.html>.  On what grounds?  Discrimination.  The tax does not affect sugary juices, milkshakes, or processed foods.

[New tax: Soft drinks with more than 5g of sugar will be taxed at 6p per can or carton and drinks with more than 8g of sugar will be taxed at 8pm, which if passed on to the consumer means a can of Old Jamaica ginger beer will go up from 58p to 66p]

The makers of artificial and alternative sweeteners<http://www.agweek.com/policy-and-politics/3990747-uk-sugary-drink-tax-could-be-sweet-food-ingredient-suppliers> think this will be a win for them.

Will the tax help reduce obesity?  On its own, that would be asking a lot<http://www.vox.com/2016/3/17/11256594/jamie-oliver-soda-tax>.

Jamie Oliver, the British chef who favors the tax, says of course it won’t work on its own<http://www.jamieoliver.com/theplan>.  It needs to be accompanied by six additional actions<http://cdn.jamieoliver.com/theplan/jamies-obesity-strategy-infographic.jpg> (food labels, better school food, curbs on marketing to kids, etc.).

Why are soda companies so worried about this?  It could be catching.

  *   Mexico already taxes sodas, and the Philippines, India, and South Africa are considering them.
  *   Berkeley has already passed <http://www.foodpolitics.com/2014/11/yesterdays-elections-plenty-of-good-news-for-the-food-movement/> a soda tax.
  *   The proposed tax in Philadelphia<http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20160317_Mayor_Kenney_launches_his_campaign_to_seek_backing_for_his_proposed_soda_tax.html> looks like it has widespread support.

Will the UK tax stick?  Watch Big Soda pull out every stop on this one.

And think about what they are doing to fight soda taxes when you read or hear that soda companies want to be part of the solution to obesity.


You are subscribed to email updates from Food Politics by Marion Nestle<http://www.foodpolitics.com>.
To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now<https://feedburner.google.com/fb/a/mailunsubscribe?k=c13hjZsHk6NfdIjo-nVif1Bfm_c>.      Email delivery powered by Google
Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States


ATOM RSS1 RSS2