NFS-L Archives

January 2016

NFS-L@HUNTER.LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Arlene Spark <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 6 Jan 2016 20:31:46 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (5 kB) , text/html (27 kB)




From: Eathropology [mailto:[log in to unmask]]

Subject: [New post] New year, same old talking heads



Adele Hite, MPH RD posted: "It may be a new year, but in the world of nutrition, not much has changed--yet. If the amount of press dedicated to who gets to say what in the next edition of a document the previous edition of which insisted no American has ever paid one whit of attenti"

Respond to this post by replying above this line









New post on Eathropology



[http://1.gravatar.com/blavatar/7d10ca408829226a60c36707cf6c0b12?s=32&d=http%3A%2F%2Fs0.wp.com%2Fi%2Femails%2Fblavatar.png&ts=1451919836]





[http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d88539f32ea4eb22edb99f4f9dd52dbe?s=50&d=identicon&r=G]<http://eathropology.com/author/foodfixer/>



New year, same old talking heads<http://eathropology.com/2016/01/04/new-year-same-old-talking-heads/>

by Adele Hite, MPH RD<http://eathropology.com/author/foodfixer/>





It may be a new year, but in the world of nutrition, not much has changed--yet. If the amount of press dedicated to who gets to say what in the next edition of a document the previous edition of which insisted no American has ever paid one whit of attention to has taught us anything, it's that "facts" don't always do what we want them to do, right, Secretary Vilsack?<http://www.c-span.org/video/?c4570358/well-informed-opinions> And so, just like David Byrne, we're stiiiilll waiting <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Zrkf65GmwE> on the 2015 Dietary Guidelines, which were due out, like, last year already.



Like the Dietary Guidelines, my life is all about things changing and staying the same.  As both of my readers probably already know, I'm smack dab in the middle of a PhD program in communication, rhetoric, and digital media<https://crdm.chass.ncsu.edu/>. Quite a switch from my work in nutrition? Not really. The things I work on in my studies now are the same things I was interested in as a PhD student in nutrition epidemiology: dietary recommendations, politics of food, the health gap, methodological issues in nutrition epidemiology of chronic disease, and the ethics of dietary policy. Only now I have a theoretical toolbox that is actually useful for critically examining those things.



Here's the thing though. I thought that approaching nutrition from the perspective of rhetorical and communication theory would help me take a big step back and take a couple of deep breaths and have a nice cool, calm, totally "academic" attitude about things. Nope. The more I study this stuff, the more ticked off I get. In fact, the more sensitized I am to the rhetoric of nutrition and the better I can identify and understand the structures of privilege and power at work in the discourse surrounding food and health in America, the angrier it makes me.  Same as it ever was<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98AJUj-qxHI>.



To avoid beginning the year with a full-on, foam-at-the-mouth rant, I am instead hosting a wonderful guest post from my good friend Jennifer Callihan over at EAT THE BUTTER.org<http://www.eatthebutter.org/#vintage-eating>. She has a smart, perceptive take on the past 35+ years of nutrition recommendations from a unique perspective. Her post, "Low Fat, High Maintenance," provides some insight as to why the low fat dietary approach really does "work" for some Americans--and really doesn't work for many more (and she does this without mentioning "insulin" once). If you haven't already, you should check out her work.<http://www.eatthebutter.org/news/>



Her post is the stepping stone to a different direction for my own writing. I'm sick of the diet wars, of "good" science vs. "bad" science, but I still think it is important to try to understand why all the talking heads of nutrition feel compelled to insist that everyone in the known universe can (and should) win at the game of "health through food" and in exactly the same way, despite vast differences in metabolic and genetic characteristics, and more importantly, economic and social contexts (I'm looking at you, Michael Pollan, Marion Nestle, Walter Willett, and--the biggest meat puppet of them all--David Katz). Jennifer not only brings a fresh new voice to the discussion, she directs our attention outside of our own bodies, to how all of us must negotiate our "food worlds" on very different terms.



Stay tuned. Jennifer's post will be up later this week, followed by some commentary by me. As grad school allows, I'll return to the regularly scheduled, full-on, foam-at-the-mouth rant already in progress.



Facts are simple and facts are straight

Facts are lazy and facts are late

Facts all come with points of view

Facts don't do what I want them to

Facts just twist the truth around

Facts are living turned inside out

Facts are getting the best of them

Facts are nothing on the face of things

Facts don't stain the furniture

Facts go out and slam the door

Facts are written all over your face

Facts continue to change their shape



--The Talking Heads, "Crosseyed and Painless"<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Zrkf65GmwE>

Adele Hite, MPH RD<http://eathropology.com/author/foodfixer/> | January 4, 2016 at 10:00 am | Tags: Dietary Guidelines<http://eathropology.com/?tag=dietary-guidelines>, Government Approved Information on Nutrition<http://eathropology.com/?tag=government-approved-information-on-nutrition>, politics<http://eathropology.com/?tag=politics> | Categories: food studies<http://eathropology.com/?cat=364145>, nutrition politics<http://eathropology.com/?cat=50958638>, US Dietary Guidelines<http://eathropology.com/?cat=4693484> | URL: http://wp.me/p29Lnc-lk

Comment<http://eathropology.com/2016/01/04/new-year-same-old-talking-heads/#respond>



   See all comments<http://eathropology.com/2016/01/04/new-year-same-old-talking-heads/#comments>





















Thanks for flying with [http://s.wordpress.com/i/emails/wp-footericon.png] WordPress.com<http://wordpress.com>








ATOM RSS1 RSS2