NFS-L Archives

March 2016

NFS-L@HUNTER.LISTSERV.CUNY.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Arlene Spark <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:50:09 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2220 bytes) , text/html (19 kB)






















REGULATION




Section sponsored by



[http://akamai.smartadserver.com/diff/86/5085497/Symrise_Logo_2_75(0).jpg]




Sugar "unacceptably high" in children's juices & smoothies and should be reduced, researchers argue<http://t.marketing1.william-reed.com/r/?id=h6d590861,24fb7288,24fbaf22&p1=VRPk1esme38qzf%2F1qC2KqQNDj4S914F4&p2=>


Parents' embracing fruit juices, juice drinks and smoothies for their children because they perceive them as a healthier alternative to sugary sodas is misguided, based on new research that found nearly half of these products marketed to children meet or exceed the daily recommended maximum sugar intake... Read <http://t.marketing1.william-reed.com/r/?id=h6d590861,24fb7288,24fbaf23&p1=VRPk1esme3%2BwQEMH6ip0Wz%2Fw%2FlwjEhAs&p2=>





CFSAF: 'GEN MILLS WAS FORCED TO MAKE DECISION BECAUSE OF SENATE'S FAILURE TO ACT'
General Mills and Mars to roll out GMO labeling nationwide as Vermont deadline looms: 'We can't label our products for only one state'<http://t.marketing1.william-reed.com/r/?id=h6d590861,24fb7288,24fbaf24&p1=VRPk1esme3%2FIhtqaudgakvcNzH1zKRee&p2=>


It was prompted by pragmatism, rather than an ideological shift, but General Mills and Mars have resolved to roll out GMO labeling nationwide as Congress has proved unable to hammer out a federal solution that all stakeholders can get behind before new labeling laws take effect in the state of Vermont in July... Read <http://t.marketing1.william-reed.com/r/?id=h6d590861,24fb7288,24fbaf25&p1=VRPk1esme393KHdoj40oQFto%2BG715%2FZ0&p2=>





POM loses false advertising case vs Coca-Cola; case offers 'rare glimpse' into how jurors regard such claims, say lawyers<http://t.marketing1.william-reed.com/r/?id=h6d590861,24fb7288,24fbaf26&p1=VRPk1esme38HQ1GiHa0TtnQCnzXJmGmf&p2=>


It famously persuaded the Supreme Court that there was a case to be heard in 2014, but POM Wonderful this week failed to convince a California jury that Coca-Cola willfully misled consumers by marketing a product comprised almost entirely of apple & grape juice as 'Pomegranate Blueberry'... Read <http://t.marketing1.william-reed.com/r/?id=h6d590861,24fb7288,24fbaf27&p1=VRPk1esme3%2B9Gvmu0Wew3F%2FEbqB%2Fx%2F4A&p2=>




















ATOM RSS1 RSS2